THIS IS TACTICAL ANALYSIS
  By Jonathan Wilson (oct 26th)
Despite the potency of Wayne
  Rooney, Robin van Persie and the
  rest of Sir Alex Ferguson's side, the Old Trafford boss faces a tactical dilemma ahead of the Stamford Bridge fixture
The longer this season goes on, the more unbalanced this Manchester United squad appears.
  Like the 1998-99 team, this side has four high-quality centre-forwards.
  Unlike the 98-99 team, though, there
  seems little clear plan as to how to
  use them.
  After Javier Hernandez, seemingly
  quicker and more muscular than last
  season, had scored twice to help
  rescue the game against Braga on
  Tuesday, Sir Alex Ferguson admitted
  his predicament. "He's got me
  thinking," he said. "He, Van Persie,
  Rooney and Welbeck; I don't know
  what to do with them to be
  honest." And that's without
  mentioning Shinji Kagawa and Tom
  Cleverley, the two other candidates
  for an attacking midfield berth.
  Although Wayne Rooney and Danny
  Welbeck can play wide and Cleverley
  and Kagawa, who is unavailable for
  the Chelsea trip after it was confirmed
  he will miss three to four weeks with a
  knee injury, can play deeper.
  United essentially have six players for
  two positions. Which hammers home
  the question asked earlier in the
  season: why spend £43 million on Van
  Persie and Kagawa, no matter how
  good the value that represents, when
  there are such obvious deficiencies
  elsewhere in the team?
  Against Braga on Tuesday, United
  played a midfield diamond with
  Darren Fletcher at the base, Kagawa
  and Cleverley to the sides and Rooney
  at the tip. With Hernandez and Van
  Persie up front, that created three
  slots for those attacking players and
  incorporated the two who naturally
  play a little deeper – at the expense of
  United's natural wide men, Antonio
  Valencia, Nani and Ashley Young.
  The decision to rest Rio Ferdinand
  meant Michael Carrick playing at
  centre-back. That left United
  defensively vulnerable, particularly in
  wide areas, but they had enough
  going forward to get away with it.
  United have employed a diamond
  four times now this season: against
  Newcastle in the League Cup and the
  Premier League, and against CFR and
  Braga in the Champions League.
  United have won all four games.
  "Teams will have to think if we are
  going to play two wide players or the
  diamond because we have players
  capable of doing both things," he said
  before the Braga game. "Players like
  Shinji Kagawa and Tom Cleverley can
  play very well in the type of matches
  the diamond offers. And of course in
  Nani, Ashley Young, Antonio Valencia,
  I've got really good wide players also.
  "It is difficult – we have had some
  success playing with the diamond.
  The history of the club is always to
  play with wide players, particularly at
  Old Trafford, so I have a decision to
  make."
  Against Newcastle, who have played
  more long balls than any other side in
  the Premier League this season, the
  ploy was clearly tactical: pack the
  middle, ensure Manchester United
  were not overrun and rely on their
  passing in tight areas to be better than
  Newcastle, while letting Rooney
  operate between the midfield and
  defensive banks in Newcastle's 4-4-2.
  For Sunday's game against Chelsea,
  the decision is more difficult.
  Chelsea's great strength this season
  has been the trident of Eden Hazard,
  Oscar and Juan Mata in their 4-2-3-1.
  Sir Alex may reason he needs two
  bodies in that area to bolster his back
  four and disrupt Chelsea's flow, in
  which case he will presumably go with
  a 4-2-3-1 of his own (he could even
  try a 4-3-3 and play Fletcher along
  with Carrick and Paul Scholes,
  although that seems unlikely).
  Or he could reason the best way to
  stop them is by controlling
  possession, to get as many players in
  the centre as possible, in which case
  the diamond would be the preferred
  option.
  That's one way of thinking about the
  game. The other way is to look at the
  vulnerability Chelsea have shown in
  wide areas. The fluent nature of the
  three in their 4-2-3-1 makes it very
  difficult for them to pick up opposing
  full-backs and that, at times, has left
  Chelsea's full-backs exposed.
  The goals scored by Gervinho and
  Pavel Pogrebnyak against Chelsea this
  season both came from Ashley Cole
  being left isolated, while for a brief
  time last Saturday, Gylfi Sigurdsson
  again and again found himself one-
  on-one against Branislav Ivanovic.
  In previous seasons, United would
  surely have looked to exploit that,
  using their wide men on the counter,
  constantly looking to drive at exposed
  full-backs.
  The problem this season is that
  United may not have the defensive or
  ball-winning capacity to play like that
  and, unless Rooney is used extremely
  deep, to field Nani and Valencia would
  mean only one of the four forwards
  getting a game.
  Sir Alex is presented with the classic
  tactical choice: be reactive and defend
  the centre (which counterintuitively
  may mean controlling possession), or
  be proactive and attack the flanks
  (which may mean sitting deep and
  ceding possession). His problem is
  that his summer signings have given
  him options in only one part of the pitch.

No comments:
Post a Comment